Rice University logo
 
Top blue bar image The American Civil War Era
The primary course blog for HIST 246, Spring 2011
 

Archive for the ‘“Black Confederates”’ Category

A “black Confederate” in Texas?

Saturday, January 15th, 2011

As you work on Blog Post #2 and your reading over the weekend, you might also want to check out this post about James Kemp Holland. It’s optional reading, but a timely post in light of our readings and discussions this week.

Holland, like Weary Clyburn and Silas Chandler, is identified on some websites as a high-ranking black Confederate officer in Texas. He married and lived in the Houston area for some time, and he actually settled eventually in Chappel Hill, which is very close to the location of the SCV billboard that I saw on my way to Brenham and talked about in class. (A picture of the billboard is here.)

This well-researched post on Holland offers a good example of how careful documentary research can be brought to bear on the question of whether there were “black Confederates.” And the connection of Holland to Houston makes it especially interesting reading for us!

Further thoughts on Blog Post #1

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

I’m extremely impressed by the overall thoughtfulness of your comments on Blog Post #1! These very sharp comments in fact got me thinking a couple of further thoughts.

First, many of you provided ample evidence to show that defenders of the “black Confederate thesis” also usually advance two related arguments: (1) that the Civil War was not about slavery; and (2) that interracial friendship and solidarity was possible in the Confederacy, to the point that some black Southerners willingly fought for the CSA. That many people believe these arguments are linked to the existence of black Confederates is clear from all of your comments. But that made me wonder: would the existence of black Confederate soldiers–even thousands of them–necessarily prove that the Civil War wasn’t about slavery, or that slavery was not oppressive? Set aside for a moment the lack of documentation for thousands of black Confederates, and consider this: would the discovery of actual black Confederate soldiers mean the war wasn’t about slavery? What would it take to prove the war was or was not about slavery?

Second, many of you suggested that remembering the Civil War in a particular way fills certain needs people have–to absolve themselves or their ancestors of guilt, for example, or distance themselves from racism. This made me wonder (and some of you alluded to this): if remembering the Civil War as a conflict that was not about slavery meets certain psychological or cultural needs for the people doing the remembering, how does depicting the Civil War as a conflict that was about slavery, or even a war to end slavery, influence the identities or satisfy the needs of people who remember it that way?

Blog Post #1

Tuesday, January 11th, 2011

As discussed in class today, the Civil War–and the role played in it by black Southerners–has recently been the subject of controversy in the national media, thanks to revelations about a faulty claim in a textbook distributed to fourth-graders in Virginia.

If that article proved one thing, it was that you can’t simply cite as fact everything you read on the Internet–perhaps especially when it’s about the Civil War. But this episode put a national spotlight on the ongoing efforts of Confederate heritage groups like the Sons of Confederate Veterans to argue that thousands of African Americans fought as soldiers for the Confederate army during the Civil War. Academic historians unanimously dispute this claim because it is not supported by documentary evidence, but the claims persist on the Internet and Confederate heritage groups continue to point to historical figures like Weary Clyburn–the man mentioned in the Looking for Lincoln excerpt we watched in class–as proof for broader claims about “black Confederates.” Yet the claims made about Clyburn by Earl Ijames, the historian pictured in that documentary, do not rest on solid evidence. And two historians have even discovered how several Confederate heritage websites falsified the image below to make it look like a picture of black Confederates. You can read about their discovery on the webpage Retouching History.

The authors of the website Retouching History discuss modern falsifications of this image of U.S. Colored Troops.

Later this semester we will talk in greater detail about the reasons why historians dispute the idea of thousands of “black Confederates,” and we’ll read a book by Bruce Levine that deals with the subject. But for now, I’d like you to think about this question: why do some groups like the SCV defend the “black Confederate” thesis so vehemently?

You may have your own speculations about what motivates claims about “black Confederates,” but throughout this semester, you need to be prepared to always defend your claims with evidence. To answer the question of why there are defenders of the “black Confederate” thesis, we need to look closely at what other arguments and hypotheses about the Civil War this idea is typically tied to or advanced with. Only then can we come to some evidence-based conclusions about why finding (or inventing) evidence of black Confederate soldiers matters so much to a small but vocal group of Americans.

Here is your assignment for Blog Post #1. First, read the following articles or blog posts, and be sure to also read through the comments left on them by readers.

Then, leave a comment here responding to these questions: What other arguments to defenders of the “black Confederate” thesis make about the Civil War era or the history that has been written about it? Do these other arguments shed any light on the question of why Confederate heritage groups are interested in finding supposed “black Confederates” like Weary Clyburn and Silas Chandler?

Back up your answer to these questions by citing specific quotations, comments, or statements that led you to your conclusion, being sure to say where you found these comments. If another student has already left a comment making the point you wanted to make it, you can still add something new by providing additional supporting evidence in support of it.